Quantcast
Channel: Knowledge Base Articles – Plaxis
Viewing all 329 articles
Browse latest View live

Copying thermal properties from the Global material database

$
0
0
Known Issue ID:
7986

Problem description

When copying a material dataset from the Global Material Database to your local material database, there is an issue with two thermal parameters due to unit conversion. The values are incorrectly converted to parameter values using the currently selected project units.

The affected parameters are:

  • cs (specific heat capacity)
  • and λs (thermal conductivity)

This is an issue for Soil, Plate, Geogrid and Anchor material datasets.

When using the default Plaxis units, these values are incorrectly multiplied by 1000 when copying them to your local material database.

Solution

In PLAXIS 2D 2016.00 and PLAXIS 2D 2016.01, when copying the soil material dataset from the global material please check these thermal properties with care, and correct them when necessary.

We are working on a solution.


Modified Cam Clay parameters in PLAXIS SensiPar

$
0
0
Known Issue ID:
7768

Problem description

The Plaxis Sensitivity Analysis & Parameter variation (SensiPar) displays and uses the parameters λ* (lambda*) and κ* (kappa*), instead of the parameters λ (lambda) and κ (kappa), as is used in the Material Dataset definition.

The relationship between these parameters is:

κ* = κ / (1 + einit)
λ* = λ / (1 + einit)

When reading the initial values from the Input program, Sensipar will convert the parameter values according to λ* and κ*. Sensipar will send the parameter values λ* (lambda*) and κ* (kappa*) as displayed in Sensipar to the Input program when running the analyses in Sensipar. For the calculation these parameters λ* (lambda*) and κ* (kappa*) will then be converted in Plaxis again so Plaxis will use again the appropriate values for λ (lambda) and κ (kappa).

Solution

For now, users are advised to define λ* and κ* for the values for the minimum, maximum and reference values in SensiPar when choosing the parameters in the Select parameters tab. Note that the initial value is converted correctly from λ/κ to λ*/κ*.

The parameters can be easily be computed as:
κ* = κ / (1 + einit)
λ* = λ / (1 + einit)

We are working on a fix for this.

[Solved] Thermal strain incorrectly includes thermal expansion of water in PLAXIS 2D 2016.00

$
0
0
Application:
Solved since:
Known Issue ID:
8430

Problem description

In 2016.00, the thermal expansion of water was contributing to the thermal strain of the soil body, which is incorrect: the displacements are only governed by the thermal expansion of the soil skeleton. The thermal expansion of liquid water plays a role in excess pore pressures and groundwater flow, but not directly in the displacements.

Solution

This issue with the thermal expansion is now solved in PLAXIS 2D 2016.01: the thermal expansion of the soil skeleton governs the thermal strain of the soil body.

If you are working with an older version, please update to the latest version.

[Solved] Tutorials 15 and 16 produce slightly different results with PLAXIS 2D 2016.01

$
0
0
Application:
Solved since:
Known Issue ID:
8396

Problem description

Due to bug fixes and improvements made in PLAXIS 2D 2016.01 related to the thermal capabilities of the calculation kernel, the results of Tutorials 15 and 16 are slightly altered. However, this change is not yet updated in the PLAXIS 2D 2016 Tutorial Manual to reflect these changes.

Solution

Tutorial 15: Thermal expansion of a navigable lock

In 2016.00, the thermal expansion of water was contributing to the thermal strain of the soil body, which is incorrect:  the displacements are only governed by the thermal expansion of the soil skeleton. The thermal expansion of liquid water plays a role in excess pore pressures and groundwater flow, but not directly in the displacements. See section 2.3 of our document on thermal and coupled THM analysis for more details. The correct results are presented below.

Updated Figure 15.17 for PLAXIS 2D 2016.01

Updated Figure 15.18 for PLAXIS 2D 2016.01

Tutorial 16: Freeze pipes in tunnel construction

Many improvements have been made to the convection-diffusion implementation, in particular in terms of calculation stability and performance. They however bring some slight changes in the results of tutorial 16. They are shown below, and as you can see, they are hardly noticeable.

 

Updated Figure 16.6 for PLAXIS 2D 2016.01

Updated Figure 16.7 for PLAXIS 2D 2016.01

Updated Figure 16.8 for PLAXIS 2D 2016.01

Pro tip

When performing a ground freezing analysis, it is good practice to check that the phase transition from liquid water to ice has been properly triggered. Due to the latent heat kicking in, we should see the temperature plateau characteristic of ground freezing. For this tutorial, when pre-selecting a node in the middle of the model, the temperature versus time plot shows the phase change plateau displayed below:

Pro tip: Temperature vs time shows latent heat plateau

 

Material parameter datasets for sheetpiles and beams

$
0
0
Application:

Attached are material databases with the necessary input parameters for several
commercially available profiles for beams and plates (sheet piles), as used commonly in geotechnical projects.

The materials sets included for plates in SheetProfiles2D.matdb and SheetProfiles3D.matdb are a selection of U-sections (AU, PU and GU profiles) and Z-sections (AZ). The steel classes used for calculating the strength properties are S 240 GP and S 430 GP.
The plastic moment given in the database for 2D plate materials is based on full plastification.

2D Sheet piles

For steels S 240 GP and S 430 GP

U section

  • AU 14 ; AU 16 ; AU 17 ; AU 18 ; AU 20 ; AU 21 ; AU 23 ; AU 25 ; AU 26 ;
  • PU 6 ; PU 8S ; PU 12 ; PU 12 10/10 ; PU 18-1 ; PU 18 ; PU 18+1 ; PU 22-1 ; PU 22 ; PU 22+1 ; PU 28-1 ; PU 28 ; PU 28+1 ; PU 32 ;
  • GU 6N ; GU 7N ; GU 7S ; GU 8N ; GU 18N ; GU 12-500 ; GU 13-500 ; GU 15-500 ; GU 16-400 ; GU 18-400 ;

Z section

  • AZ 12 ; AZ 13 ; AZ 14 ; AZ 17 ; AZ 18 ; AZ 19 ; AZ 25 ; AZ 26 ; AZ 28 ; AZ 46 ; AZ 48 ; AZ 50 ;
  • AZ 13 10/10 ; AZ 18 10/10 ;
  • AZ 12-770 ; AZ 13-770 ; AZ 14-770 ; AZ 14-770-10/10 ; AZ 17-700 ; AZ 18-700 ; AZ 19-700 ; AZ 20-700 ; AZ 24-700 ; AZ 26-700 ; AZ 28-700 ; AZ 37-700 ; AZ 39-700 ; AZ 41 -700 ;
  • AZ 36-700N ; AZ 38-700N ; AZ 40-700N ; AZ 42-700N ; AZ 44-700N ; AZ 46-700N ;

Damping is not considered in these material parameters.

3D Sheet piles

U section

  • AU 14 ; AU 16 ; AU 17 ; AU 18 ; AU 20 ; AU 21 ; AU 23 ; AU 25 ; AU 26
  • PU 6 ; PU 8S ; PU 12 ; PU 12 10/10 ; PU 18-1 ; PU 18 ; PU 18+1 ; PU 22-1 ; PU 22 ; PU 22+1 ; PU 28-1 ; PU 28 ; PU 28+1 ; PU 32
  • GU 6N ; GU 7N ; GU 7S ; GU 8N ; GU 18N ; GU 12-500 ; GU 13-500 ; GU 15-500 ; GU 16-400 ; GU 18-400

Z section

  • AZ 12 ; AZ 13 ; AZ 14 ; AZ 17 ; AZ 18 ; AZ 19 ; AZ 25 ; AZ 26 ; AZ 28 ; AZ 46 ; AZ 48 ; AZ 50 ; AZ 13 10/10 ;
  • AZ 18 10/10 ;  ; AZ 12-770 ; AZ 13-770 ; AZ 14-770 ; AZ 14-770-10/10 ; AZ 17-700 ; AZ 18-700 ; AZ 19-700 ; AZ 20-700 ; AZ 24-700 ; AZ 26-700 ; AZ 28-700 ; AZ 37-700 ; AZ 39-700 ; AZ 41 -700 ; AZ 36-700N ; AZ 38-700N ; AZ 40-700N ; AZ 42-700N ; AZ 44-700N ; AZ 46-700N

The parameters are based on the assumptions as mentioned in the Material Models manual and as mentioned on this knowledge base page: Material datasets for plates: sheet pile wall in bending
Damping is not considered in these material parameters.

3D Beams

For the case of beams for 3D, in BeamProfiles3D.matdb, some common IPE and HE profiles are included.

Latest update for these profile datasets: July 2016

IPE

  • IPE AA 80 ; IPE A 80 ; IPE 80 ; IPE AA 100 ; IPE A 100 ; IPE 100 ; IPE AA 120 ; IPE A 120 ; IPE 120 ; IPE AA 140 ; IPE A 140 ; IPE 140 ; IPE AA 160 ; IPE A 160 ; IPE 160 ; IPE AA180 ; IPE A 180 ; IPE 180 ; IPE O 180 ; IPE AA 200 ; IPE A 200 ; IPE 200 ; IPE O 200 ; IPE AA 220 ; IPE A 220 ; IPE 220 ; IPE O 220 ; IPE AA 240 ; IPE A 240 ; IPE 240 ; IPE O 240 ; IPE A 270 ; IPE 270 ; IPE O 270 ; IPE A 300 ; IPE 300 ; IPE O 300 ; IPE A 330 ; IPE 330 ; IPE O 330 ; IPE A 360 ; IPE 360 ; IPE O 360 ; IPE A 400 ; IPE 400 ; IPE O 400 ; IPE A 450 ; IPE 450 ; IPE O 450 ; IPE A 500 ; IPE 500 ; IPE O 500

HE

  • HE 100 AA ; HE 100 A ; HE 100 B ; HE 100 C ; HE 100 M ; HE 120 AA ; HE 120 A ; HE 120 B ; HE 120 C ; HE 120 M ; HE 140 AA ; HE 140 A ; HE 140 B ; HE 140 C ; HE 140 M ; HE 160 AA ; HE 160 A ; HE 160 B ; HE 160 C ; HE 160 M ; HE 180 AA ; HE 180 A ; HE 180 B ; HE 180 C ; HE 180 M ;
  • HE 200 AA ; HE 200 A ; HE 200 B ; HE 200 C ; HE 200 M ; HE 220 AA ; HE 220 A ; HE 220 B ; HE 220 C ; HE 220 M ; HE 240 AA ; HE 240 A ; HE 240 B ; HE 240 C ; HE 240 M ; HE 260 AA ; HE 260 A ; HE 260 B ; HE 260 C ; HE 260 M ; HE 280 AA ; HE 280 A ; HE 280 B ; HE 280 C ; HE 280 M ;
  • HE 300 AA ; HE 300 A ; HE 300 B ; HE 300 C ; HE 300 M ; HE 320 AA ; HE 320 A ; HE 320 B ; HE 320 C ; HE 320 M ; HE 340 AA ; HE 340 A ; HE 340 B ; HE 340 M ; HE 360 AA ; HE 360 A ; HE 360 B ; HE 360 M ;
  • HE 400 AA ; HE 400 A ; HE 400 B ; HE 400 M ; HE 450 AA ; HE 450 A ; HE 450 B ; HE 450 M ; E 500 AA ; HE 500 A ; HE 500 B ; HE 500 M ; HE 550 AA ; HE 550 A ; HE 550 B ; HE 550 M ;
  • HE 600 AA ; HE 600 A ; HE 600 B ; HE 600 M ; HE 600 x 337

Using a database file

To use such a downloaded database, download it to a folder with full access for the user. When in the program, open the material database and select the appropriate category: plates for SheetPiles2D and SheetPiles3D, and beams for BeamProfiles3D. Then click on the Select button to open the new global material database for the sheet pile profiles or beam profiles.

Disclaimer

The data used for creating these databases is courtesy of ArcelorMittal.
It is provided without warranty of any kind. Anyone making use of it does so at his/her own risk.
PLAXIS does not accept responsibility nor can be held liable for any damages including loss of profits, loss of savings, injuries or any other incidental or consequential damage arising from the use or inability to use the information contained within.
PLAXIS suggests contacting ArcelorMittal to ensure the suitability of a given steel section for a particular application.

 

Downloads

SheetProfiles2D.matdb2D - sheet pile wall profile dataother| 107.37 KB
SheetProfiles3D.matdb3D - sheet pile wall profile dataother| 68.23 KB
BeamProfiles_HE_Plaxis_3D[2016].matdbDatabase for PLAXIS 3D - containing HE profile datasets (version July 2016)other| 82.21 KB
BeamProfiles_IPE_Plaxis_3D[2016].matdbDatabase for PLAXIS 3D - containing IPE profile datasets (version July 2016)other| 35.27 KB

3D AE report generator may fail with tables for anchors or drains

$
0
0
Known Issue ID:
3966

Problem description

With the report generator it is possible to export various results from your calculation. However, it appears that when selecting one or more of the following General information sets, the report generator fails and gives a bugreport. These sets are:

  • Table of fixed-end anchors
  • Table of node-to-node anchors
  • Table of drains
  • Virtual interface thickness

The bugreport occurs only when no data for one of the above mentioned selected sets is available in the current calculation.

For instance, if the calculated model does not contain any drains, by selecting the Table for drains will result in the report generator failing with a bug report.

When looking more into the details (Show bugreport), the first line in the call stacks will refer to the following:

     TTableConstructorReportStructure.DoFillTable
     TTableConstructor.Construct
     TTableDataStructures.Initialize

Solution

For now, you are advised to avoid selecting All in the General information [3/8], which will include the table results for one of the structures that does not exist in the calculated model.
You can easily de-select any of these sets by making sure that there is no checkmark in the selection box.

This issue will be fixed in an upcoming version of PLAXIS 3D.

On the Use of the ShotCrete UDSM for Modelling Concrete

$
0
0
Author:
Published on:
August, 2016
Application:

Introduction

The aim of the report is to evaluate the applicability of the recently developed shotcrete model by Schadlich & Schweiger (2014) for plain and reinforced concrete structures. We will very briefly explain how the model parameters must be set for dealing with plain and reinforced concrete structures. Then we will go through three different validation
exercises corresponding to respectively:

  • Indirect tension of a notched beam
  • Mixed fracture mode of a notched beam
  • Three point bending test of a reinforced concrete beam

For each example, the model geometry and chosen material parameters will be provided and most relevant results will be commented and compared against experimental data.

Conclusion

For each example, numerical results have shown very good agreement against available experimental data which demonstrates the perfect applicability of the Shotcrete user-defined model for modelling the behaviour of 'mature' plain concrete and reinforced concrete under static loading in PLAXIS.

Downloads

[Solved] Structural forces from automatic centerline might be incorrect in PLAXIS 2D 2016.00

$
0
0
Application:
Solved since:
Known Issue ID:
5172

Problem description

In 2016.00, the automatic centerline might not detect the structural forces correctly for an internal tunnel lining connected to concrete elements at the end points.

For example, the axial forces and the bending moments might be incorrect, as shown Figure 1 and Figure 2.

Figure 1. Incorrect bending moments calculated with automatic centerline (left) and correct values with manual centerline (right)

Figure 2. Incorrect normal force values calculated with automatic centerline (left) and correct values with manual centerline (right)

In Figure 1 the bending moment line generated from the automatic centerline shows no bending moment at the top and bottom of the side drift, which is incorrect as all connections are rigid in this tunnel case. The correct behaviour should display a bending moment at the top and bottom of the line.

Similarly, in Figure 2 the axial force should be the lowest at the top and gradually increase downwards due to the self weight of the concrete of the side drift. This is not the behaviour displayed in PLAXIS 2D 2016.00.

Solution

This issue with the automatic centerline detection is now solved in PLAXIS 2D 2016.01.

If you are working with an older version, please update to the latest version.


User defined Python script (3D): Extract displacements by coordinates

$
0
0
Application:

Description

A small Python script was written to obtain deformation results using the Remote scripting features in the PLAXIS 3D AE Output program. The results are retrieved using Output’s getsingleresult command for a set of coordinates written in a text file. The retrieved results are stored in a separate text file.

This Python script was written for PLAXIS 3D AE in combination with Python 3.4.x

Instructions

  1. Make sure PLAXIS 3D Output is running with a VIP licence;
  2. Write a text file with points' coordinates to retrieve the data for;
  3. Launch the Remote server on PLAXIS 3D Output on port 10001 (look for outputport variable);
  4. Run the Python script to retrieve the deformations;
  5. Point to the correct text file for the points' coordinates;
  6. The results are then stored in a text file with this content per line:
      phasename  pointname  ux  uy  uz  
  7. This text file is ready to copy & paste to Microsoft Excel or any other spreadsheet program

Developer

Filippo Forlani

Contact

Filippo Forlani
SGAI srl, ITALY
www.sgai.net
email: filfor @ gmail.com
Twitter @FilippoForlani

Licence

This Python script is licenced under GNU GPL 3.0

Disclaimer: This Python script is made available as a service to Plaxis users to be used in combination with a VIP licence. However, Plaxis does not accept any responsibility when using this Python script in combination with Plaxis. Hence, the user needs to validate results obtained from this script by him/herself. Plaxis does not provide support on the use of this Python script.

Downloads

UDPy_extract_U.py.txtPython file to extract deformation results. Right click and use Save as... and rename to use .py extensionother| 2.61 KB

UDSM - SHANSEP MC model

$
0
0
Application:

The SHANSEP MC model (Stress History and Normalized Soil Engineering Properties) constitutes a soil model implemented in PLAXIS, intended for undrained soil loading conditions. It is based on the linear elastic perfectly-plastic Mohr-Coulomb model, but modified such that it is able to simulate potential changes of the undrained shear strength su (cu) based on the effective stress state of the soil. It takes into account the effects of stress history and stress path in characterizing soil strength and in predicting field behaviour.

Section 4. Failure mechanism of the Shansep MC model

Section 4. Failure mechanism of the Mohr Coulomb - Undrained B model

 


In order to obtain the model, send your request to sales@plaxis.com. Support on the use of the SHANSEP MC soil model is only provided for this DLL under the conditions of the PLAXIS VIP support service and Article 10 of the End-User Licence Agreement.

Downloads

Plaxis UDSM - SHANSEP MC model (2016).pdfThe SHANSEP MC model (version 2016)pdf| 9.31 MB

Node-to-Node anchors as an alternative for Fixed-End anchors

$
0
0
Application:

Fixed-End (FE) anchors are single point spring elements that can be used to model anchors, struts and other types of ‘flexible’ supports. PLAXIS 2D and 3D allow for only one FE anchor per geometry point. However, in some situations, it may be required to fix a structure in different directions using spring supports, such as indicated in the figure below.

This would require two or more FE anchors to be applied at the same geometry point, which is currently not possible.

The way to overcome this limitation is to use None-to-Node (N2N) anchors instead of FE anchors. N2N anchors form a spring connection between two geometry points. However, the second point may also be a fixed point at the model (bottom) boundary, which makes that the N2N anchor basically works as an FE anchor.

In the above example case, the vertical FE anchor could be replaced by a vertical N2N anchor with its lowest point connected to the bottom boundary.

Now, there are three issues to consider:

  1. The direction of an FE anchor can be defined as an anchor property, whereas the direction of a N2N anchor is just its orientation in the geometry model. The spring support is in this direction. Considering that the bottom boundary is used for the fixed point, the replacement of an FE anchor by an N2N anchor works best for a (primarily) vertical support.
  2. The equivalent length of an FE anchor can be defined as an anchor property, whereas the equivalent length of an N2N anchor is the distance between the two geometry points to which the anchor is connected. Since the distance between the point to be supported and the model boundary may be different than the desired equivalent length, a ‘scaling factor’ needs to be applied on the anchor stiffness in the corresponding material data set. For example, if the equivalent length is supposed to be 5 m and the length of the N2N anchor to the bottom of the model is 10 m, then the axial stiffness EA in the material data set must be set twice as high as the actual stiffness. Alternatively, the anchor spacing may be decreased by a factor 2, which has the same scaling effect.
  3. Make sure that the boundary to which the N2N anchor is connected is active in all calculation phases in which the anchor is supposed to be active. For the bottom boundary this is generally the case, but note that if for some reason, the part of the boundary where the fixed point is attached is de-activated, the N2N anchor will automatically be de-activated as well.

Modelling technique: Vacuum consolidation

$
0
0
Application:

Vacuum consolidation is a technique to apply preloading on a construction site by creating an 'under-pressure' in the ground and thus using the external atmospheric pressure as preloading. In this way, the stability of the sub-soil is increased and settlements during and after the construction are reduced. This technique is usually applied on near-saturated soils with a high water table. This article explains the details of modelling vacuum consolidation in PLAXIS.

There are various methods of vacuum consolidation in the real world, but they are all modelled in a similar way in PLAXIS. Most methods in reality are using vertical drains, which are somehow connected at the top to an air pump that reduces the air pressure in the drains until a near-vacuum exists. In practice, a complete vacuum (100 kN/m2 pressure) is not achievable, but an effective under-pressure of 60 - 90 kN/m2.

Since PLAXIS does not take air pressure into account (atmospheric pressure is assumed to be the zero reference pressure level), a reduction of the groundwater head is used instead to simulate vacuum consolidation. This means that the way vacuum consolidation is modelled leads to negative pore stresses (suction), which are not there in reality.

1 Vacuum consolidation in a one-dimensional soil column

In the simplified case of a one-dimensional soil column, vacuum consolidation can be modelled by performing a groundwater flow calculation or a fully coupled flow-deformation analysis with hydraulic conditions at the model boundaries such that in the vacuum area the groundwater head is prescribed at a level that is 10 m (or less) lower than the vertical coordinate of the global phreatic level. A reduction of the groundwater head of 10 m is equivalent to an under-pressure of 100 kN/m2 (i.e. complete vacuum).

2 Vacuum consolidation in a 2D or 3D model

In a 2D or 3D numerical model of a realistic project, vacuum consolidation can be modelled by performing a groundwater flow calculation or a fully coupled flow-deformation analysis with vacuum drains in which the head specified in those drains is 10 m (or less) lower than the vertical coordinate of the global phreatic level. A reduction of the groundwater head of 10 m is equivalent to an under-pressure of 100 kN/m2. The distance between the vacuum drains in the model is arbitrary, but should be selected such that the difference in groundwater head in the vacuum area is limited. In general, a distance between the drains less than a quarter of the drain length seems appropriate (i.e. complete vacuum).

3 Other requirements

A reduction of the groundwater head implies that the soil in the vacuum area becomes unsaturated, whilst this soil volume is supposed to be fully saturated. The user must arrange additionally that saturated conditions apply to this volume. This requires the following settings to be made in the corresponding material data sets:

  • The unsaturated unit weight, γunsat (General tabsheet of the Material data set), must be set equal to the saturated unit weight, γsat.
  • The hydraulic model must be set to Saturated after selecting User-defined as hydraulic data set (Model group in Groundwater tabsheet).

If these settings are not made, the unit weight of the soil will change from saturated to unsaturated as soon as the phreatic level drops as a result of the reduction of the groundwater head in the vacuum drains. Moreover, the soil permeability will reduce according to the reduced relative permeability in the unsaturated zone, depending on the selected hydraulic data set (by default Fine material). Both effects are not realistic and can be overcome by making the aforementioned changes in the corresponding material data sets.

4 Calculation options

Vacuum consolidation (using reduced groundwater head boundary conditions or reduced heads in vacuum drains) can be applied in the following calculation types:

  • Plastic (select Steady-state groundwater flow as Pore pressure calculation type);
  • Consolidation (select Steady-state groundwater flow as Pore pressure calculation type);
  • Fully-coupled flow-deformation analysis.

This means that all input requirements for a groundwater flow calculation have to be met, i.e:

  • All material data sets must have non-zero permeabilities;
  • Hydraulic boundary conditions (groundwater head and closed flow boundaries, if applicable) must have been specified.

Moreover, it is required to de-select the Ignore suction option in the Deformation control parameters section of the Phases window.

Note that only vacuum drains allow a groundwater head to be specified below the actual drain level, which leads to tensile pore stresses (suction). Normal drains do not allow for suction. Also note that, if vacuum drains are used in a Consolidation calculation whilst the pore pressure calculation type is set to Phreatic, the drains will work as normal drains rather than vacuum drains. This means that they only affect the consolidation of excess pore pressures, whilst the steady-state pore pressure is fully determined by the global water level and local cluster settings.

5 Switching-off vacuum

If the vacuum is to be 'switched-off' in subsequent calculations while the drains are still supposed to be active for consolidation purposes, the corresponding head in the drains needs to be changed from the reduced head level to the original global water level. This leads to the situation that the new pressure head in the drain is higher than the groundwater head in the area around the drain. As a result, one might expect that water
will be flowing from the drain into the ground, which is an artefact of the numerical modelling of vacuum consolidation.

In order to avoid such unrealistic behaviour, PLAXIS prevents at all times water to flow from a drain into the surrounding soil, since drains are meant to drain water out of the ground rather than bring water into the ground. Hence, the aforementioned artefact will not occur in PLAXIS.


This text is taken from the PLAXIS 2D 2016 Reference Manual

Can I reuse existing PLAXIS 3D geometrical objects in a new project?

$
0
0
Application:

Sometimes you want to reuse a part of the geometry of an already existing PLAXIS 3D model in a different model. With PLAXIS 3D it is possible to export the geometry from Input using the command __saveobjects. The volumes and surfaces from these objects can be easily imported into a newly created PLAXIS 3D project using the Import soil... and Import structures... options in Input.

The available formats of the exported files in PLAXIS 3D 2016 are:

  • OpenCascade BRep files (*.brep)
  • Standard for the Exchange of Product model files (*.step)

The command has the following structure:

__saveobjects"brep""C:\PLAXIS3D\Objects"

Parameters:

__saveobjectsthe command, note the double underscore
"brep"file extension of the exported geometry file. In this case geometry.brep
"C:\PLAXIS3D\Objects"directory of the saved objects

The file geometry.<extenstion> exported in the specified directory include objects present in the Blue coloured tabs in PLAXIS Input program. These supported geometric objects created in Blue tabs (Soil / Structures) are:

  • Surfaces and Polygons
  • Volumes
  • Soil volumes from boreholes

Note in PLAXIS 3D AE, PLAXIS 3D 2013 and earlier, only these were available (but are no longer supported in the latest version): Plaxis 3D Object files (*.px3o), Stereolithography files (*.stl) and Plaxis Mesh files (*.plxmesh). See the attached PDF document for details.

For more details on the __saveobjects-command or any other command, please refer to the Plaxis 3D Command Reference, available via the Help menu.

Downloads

PLAXIS_3D_AE_reuse_existing_3D_geometricalobjects.pdfPLAXIS 3D AE, PLAXIS 3D 2013 and earlier: Can I reuse existing PLAXIS 3D geometrical objects in a new project?pdf| 98.11 KB

Modelling a tapered pile

$
0
0
Application:

There are two options to model a massive tapered pile easily:

1. Using the cone

This shape of a tapered pile can be achieved by making use of the "cone" command.

1.1 Cone command

cone<baseradiusr_b> <coneheighth> [<topradiusr_t>]<point> <directionvector>

with

  • radiusr_b = Dtop /2 (Dtop is diameter at the top of the pile)
  • coneheight h is height of the total cone structure
  • optional radius r_t at the (truncated) top
  • point is the center point for the cone’s base
  • direction vector tells in which direction the cone should be pointing. For a vertical tapered pile this should be (0 0 -1)
  • Note: the cone command only creates the volume.

1.2 Soil structure interaction

When one wants to model soil-structure interaction, interfaces should be added:

  • Select the cone's volume;
  • Use the right mouse button (RMB), and select Decompose into surfaces to make surfaces on the outside of the cone;
  • And now apply outside (positive) interfaces to the three surfaces.

1.3 Pile activation

This concludes the geometry creation. To activate the pile for the calculation, make sure to change the soil material inside the pile volume into the pile’s material in the appropriate phase including activation of the interfaces.

2. Import from CAD

Of course it is always possible to model the geometry in a third party CAD program and then import this geometry in PLAXIS 3D. See How do I import a geometry in PLAXIS 3D? for more tips on importing

After importing, make sure to add interfaces to properly model soil-structure interaction.

Downloads

PLAXIS_3D_AE_Modelling_tapered_pile_using_cone_command.pdfModelling a tapered pile in PLAXIS 3D 2013 / 3D AE / 3D Classic using the cone commandpdf| 110.16 KB

[Solved] Possible over-estimation of lateral circular pile bearing capacity

$
0
0
Solved since:
Known Issue ID:
15876

Problem description

When using circular shapes in Plaxis 3D AE, PLAXIS 3D 2013 and earlier to generate e.g. circular piles consisting of volume elements or plate elements, the resulting elements (volume elements, plate elements and interface elements) are not fully curved (isoparametric), but they have straight sides (see figure below). As a result, at the connection between two adjacent straight elements a significant corner may occur.

 

It was found that in this way possible locking may occur in the interface elements, particularly if the circular shape (e.g. a pile) is subjected to lateral loading. As a result, the interface elements will not yield, and the (lateral) pile bearing might be over-estimated due to the following reasons:

  • Any given (reduced) interface shear strength is not taken into effect because the large normal stiffness of the adjacent interface will prevent lateral shear stresses to develop.
  • The earliest possibility to yield is in the stress points of the adjacent soil volume elements outside the pile, which increases the effective pile diameter.

Hence, care has to be taken with the interpretation of the lateral pile bearing capacity from the results of the current analysis.

Note: This issue is about ultimate limit state (ULS) loading conditions, the results under working load conditions (SLS) give reasonable results, even with the mentioned interface locking problem.

Solution

With the release of PLAXIS 3D 2016 we made huge changes to the internal definition of the geometry data: now the geometry is described with parametric functions, and this solves this issue with interface locking. Please see the related article on Fully Parametric geometry for more information.

For older versions (PLAXIS 3D AE, 3D 2013) in order to overcome this issue, a special version of the PLAXIS 3D calculation kernel is available upon request, in which the mesh is optimised to match a smooth circle.  A successful analysis with this special kernel is shown in the related article "PLAXIS 3D Benchmark for Bearing Capacity of Suction Anchors" by R. Witasse


Tunnels in PLAXIS 3D: Extrusions and cutting planes

$
0
0

Problem description

Since the release of PLAXIS 3D AE tunnels can be modelled more efficiently using the 3D Tunnel designer, which reduces the need to make use of the tips discussed below. For PLAXIS 3D 2016, the issue is now completely resolved by not using the internal trianglation, see the related article on Fully parametric geometry.

For older the discussed approach may still be relevant.

In the PLAXIS 3D program all geometric surfaces and the volume sides (so called BReps or Boundary Representations) are internally made up of triangles.


Figure 1. Rectangle and soil block and their BRep triangles (right)

Surfaces and volumes resulting from an extrusion are also made up of triangles.The extrusion tool executes the following steps:

  • it will first make a copy of the shape to be extruded, and it will create a copy at the end of the extrusion vector, so called cap faces (see C in the image below)
  • it will create a side surface, connecting the cap faces
  • the surfaces will be combined (see D in the image below)
  • and as a result we will have a new volume, that is built out of triangulated surfaces (see D and E in the image below)


Figure 2. Extrusion of a rectangular surface

As can be seen in the above example, the side of the extruded volume also consists of triangles. When the extrusion vector is very long, the side triangles will become very long as well.

When shapes like tunnels are being generated using a polycurve for the cross section and then use extrusion for the tunnel path, it will also generate these long triangles on the side surfaces (or in this case the tunnel lining):


Figure 3. Tunnel side face (top) and its BRep triangles

In itself this is not an issue, and the tunnel shape can be used without problems for intersection, mesh generation and calculation, with and without e.g. plates and interfaces.

Cutting planes

However, when cutting planes are introduced to model the staged construction of the tunnel, an issue with accuracy might occur when the tunnel shape is intersected with these cutting planes.


Figure 4. Tunnel with cutting planes

In order to explain what happens per triangle on those long internal (BRep) triangles on the tunnel lining, first it is shown what will happen when we intersect a part of the tunnel’s side surface with a cutting plane (represented here with a line)


Figure 5. Part of a tunnel’s side face (top) and intersected BRep triangles (bottom)

The image above shows that the contour of the long triangle is still intact and that these triangles are subdivided into several smaller triangles.

For very long triangles on such surfaces, this could lead to the generation of very small triangles for which the corner vertices are located at a distance nearing the numerical tolerance that is used in the PLAXIS 3D program. This could result in all kinds of issues when going to the mesh mode.


Figure 6. Long, narrow tunnel side face intersected with cutting plane

Solution

The problems described here are not applicable to PLAXIS 3D 2016

When an error with intersections occurs, and these do not occur without the cutting planes, these possible workarounds exist:

1. Create arrays

A simple, but convenient method to generate the desired geometry and cutting planes, is to create the first tunnel slice. Then select the tunnel slice and use the array tool to add all the sections. This will give separate objects for all sections, and can only be applied for straight tunnels.

2. Use the extrusion tool along a second polycurve

This option is available since PLAXIS 3D 2012

Instead of using an extrusion vector, a second polycurve is used as path such that it matches the excavation slices. As example we will use a straight tunnel that will have 20 cutting planes with a distance of 1 m between each of them. The second polycurve, created with the shape designer too, (Polycurve_2) will consist of 21 line segments all with 1 m length, and it must be placed exactly on the starting point of the polycurve that represents the tunnel cross section (let’s call this Polycurve_1). If we now would use the following command: extrude Polycurve_1 Polycurve_2, the tunnel shape will be extruded over the second polycurve, and it will not generate such long triangles on the sides.

The cutting planes still need to be added though.

To create this, follow these steps:

  1. create the tunnel’s cross section in the shape designer (Polycurve_1).
  2. create a second shape in the shape designer (Polycurve_2). It should be a free form shape, and the starting point should be at the same location as the insertion point of the tunnel cross section polycurve. For the axis direction, please make sure that the first axis points towards the desired direction. If the tunnel path is in the X-direction, make sure that axis 1’s orientation is in the X-direction. In the Segments part, add 21 line segments, all with a 1 m length:

    Figure 7. Shape designer to create tunnel path with line segments
  3. With the following command, the tunnel’s side faces will be created:
    extrude Polycurve_1 Polycurve_2
  4. and finally, add the cutting planes

Select points for curves prior to calculation directly in Input

$
0
0

Normally, the Output program is needed to select specific nodes and stress points for which data will be stored during the calculation. This data can be used to generate curves. Alternatively, it is also possible to select points for curves prior to the calculation by using the command line in PLAXIS 2D AE Input and PLAXIS 3D Input. This can be useful when using commands in the commands runner for example.

Two command options are available:

  • using /output[...] to send commands from the PLAXIS Input program to the PLAXIS Output program.
  • or directly use the command __selectcurvepoints in Input. Note this command will be depricated and removed in future versions of PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D.

/output to send commands to Output

In order to control Plaxis Output through commands, first Output needs to be launched properly by first using the command selectmeshpoints from Input. Then, you can call any Output command from Input by prefixing the command with /output. Input will then know that this command should be send to Output in order to execute it. We can use the addcurvepoint command to select nodes and stresspoints, and finally we need to store the selected nodes and stress points using /outputupdate.

To select points for curves prior to calculation, the commands in Input would look like this:

selectmeshpoints/outputaddcurvepoint"Node"(xyz)/outputaddcurvepoint"StressPoint"(xyz)/outputupdate

Note, the brackets in the command are not necessary, but help to read the line.

See also the Command Reference via the Help menu for more details.

__selectcurvepoints (Input only)

Note this command will be depricated and removed in future versions of PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D.

__selectcurvepoints

This command will do the following:

  1. it will clean all prior selected points for curves
  2. for each set of coordinates it will find the closest node and closest stress point in the generated mesh and select those as pre-calculation selected nodes and stress points
  3. the maximum number of coordinates is 10

Note:

  • the command will remove any existing selection
  • if the point does not exist, it will take the nearest one. When the mesh is changed, the exact location of this selected node could change from the earlier made selection. To force a specific point to be in the generated mesh: add a point at this location and refine it appropriately (e.g. a factor of 0.25 when close to other geometry).
  • Stress points are internal points inside an element, so it is not possible to force a specific location for stress points
  • when specifying a point on a boundary, the nearest stress point will be based on the local element distribution and element size
  • when interfaces are involved, the selected node cannot be predicted. It can be part of the positive interface, of the negative interface or of the plate element in between, because all these nodes have the same coordinates.
  • and the command currently only works in mesh mode.

Examples

To select just one coordinate in PLAXIS 2D

__selectcurvepoints 5 0

This will result in selecting node A and stress point K nearest to (x , y) =  (5, 0)

To select just one coordinate in PLAXIS 3D

__selectcurvepoints 0 3 5

This will result in selecting node A and stress point K nearest to (x , y,  z) =  (0, 3, 5)

To select multiple coordinates in PLAXIS 3D

__selectcurvepoints (0 0 1)(10 0 1)(-10 1 2)(0 3 1)(0 -3.5 2.13)

This will result in selecting

  • node A and stress point K nearest to (x , y,  z) =  (0, 0, 1)
  • node B and stress point L nearest to (x , y,  z) =  (10, 0, 1)
  • node C and stress point M nearest to (x , y,  z) =  (-10, 1, 2)
  • node D and stress point N nearest to (x , y,  z) =  (0, 3, 1)
  • node E and stress point O nearest to (x , y,  z) =  (0, -3.5 , 2.13)

Note, the brackets in the command are not necessary, but help to read the line.

See also the Command Reference via the Help menu.

PLAXIS 3D 2016: Fully parametric geometry

$
0
0
Application:

Introduction

Developments for PLAXIS 3D AE and PLAXIS 3D 2016 changed the internal structure of the geometry definition. In versions prior to PLAXIS 3D AE (3D 2013, 3D 2012, and older), the internal geometry data structure was entirely based on triangles. In more complex projects, especially those with curved shapes, this created issues and limitations.
PLAXIS 3D AE is a transitional version; it is a hybrid version: parametric geometry for natively created surfaces and volumes, while triangulated geometry from boreholes and imported CAD geometry. In PLAXIS 3D 2016, however, the entire geometry is solely based on parametric geometry.

Issues with tessellated geometry

In PLAXIS 3D 2013 and older, the internal structure of the entire geometry is tessellated: all geometric surfaces and the volume sides (so called BReps or Boundary Representations) are internally made up of triangles.


Figure 1. Rectangle and soil block and their BRep triangles (right)

This works great when using basic, straight sided shapes. But in the case of curved shapes, like arcs, circles and cylinders, this tessellation leads to an approximation of these curved shapes: the straight sides of the triangles have to form the boundary of these shapes.

Of course, when defining a circular shape ideally you want to retain this shape, and not have a shape that approximates this arc. When trying to connect other geometry to these shapes, due to this approximation, this may be very challenging. You can think about connecting tunnels, side tunnels and galleries, but also combi-walls when connecting the tubular piles (cylinders) with sheet pile walls (surfaces).

Not having a fully curved shape can also have consequences on the model results, for instance, due to interface locking when such an approximated circular shape contains significant corners in the interface definition loaded under large shearing conditions.

Linked problem: Possible over-estimation of lateral circular pile bearing capacity [link]

A second issue is caused by the internal triangulation of multiple shapes that have to be intersected. This intersection takes place when we change from the geometry creation mode (Soil / Structures mode) to one of the green modes where we will work with the final geometry for meshing and calculations (Mesh / Flow conditions / Staged construction). This intersection is necessary to be able to uniquely identify parts of the entire model’s geometry, e.g., soil inside or outside an excavation, or surface loads left and right from a wall.
To ensure that the program does not incorrectly change the geometry, the original tessellation is retained. This implies that the original triangles in the tessellation will be kept, and may be subdivided into several parts for discretizing the intersected "cut objects".

See the example below of a tunnel shape (Figure 2) with a cutting planes to simulate tunnel construction stages. When zooming in the behaviour of one cutting plane with the tunnel (Figure 3), we can still recognize the original two triangles (B) in the intersection result (C).


Figure 2. Tunnel with cutting plane to simulate staged construction segments


Figure 3. Tunnel side view and cutting plane (magenta) with (internal) tessellation rendering (B,C)

When the intersection of two geometric objects is close to e.g., edges, then this can become complicated. If from the previous example the surface is very long and the cutting plane is close to the left edge of the surface, we will get a small triangle in the intersection results, see Figure 4 below:


Figure 4. Long tunnel side face and cutting plane with (internal) tessellation rendering

When the dimensions of such small triangles are below the geometrical tolerances used in the PLAXIS 3D program, these small triangles will be considered to be obsolete, and will be filtered out of the geometry, which will lead to failing intersection actions.

Linked problem: Tunnels in PLAXIS 3D: Extrusions and cutting planes [link]

Solution: Parametric geometry

Approximating real 3D curves shaped using tessellated geometry gives problems in some cases, as explained above. In order to solve these issues related to approximation and discretization, we worked hard on implementing a geometric data structure based on mathematical modelling of shapes and objects, i.e. an arc is an arc, not an approximation. Since the geometry is now based on mathematical equations using parameters to describe geometry, e.g., radius and centre point for an arc, we refer to this as parametric geometry.

With this parametric geometry, we now also have true intersections of the true shapes: we do not have to approximate the geometry using internal subsections. This avoids one of the above mentioned problems with the internal triangles.
Also importantly, the Finite Element mesh will define the geometry very accurately: the true shapes can now be given to the meshing algorithms, resulting in an accurately geometric description of the Finite element locations, including arcs.

Noticeable changes

The new PLAXIS 3D geometry data model will show us smoother meshes with higher quality elements for curved shapes like piles, shafts and tunnels:


Figure 5. Cylinder shape and  fine mesh. Left in PLAXIS 3D 2013, right PLAXIS 3D 2016

As can be seen in the image above, the cylindrical shape will give us a smoother shape, more evenly distributed elements and a better geometrical description with less elements. Overall this will give us higher quality meshes with less elements. Since the calculation time is highly influenced by the number of elements, we will gain calculation speed improvements by having a better description of the Finite Element mesh geometry.

Shape designer

Arcs: no segments

Since PLAXIS 3D AE, the shape designer does not use segments anymore to define a curved shape: we now support parametric geometry for these arc-shapes, and so we do not need to approximate the curved shape anymore using small straight sections. So if you want to describe a circle, it can just be done without using segments, and the internal geometry description will make it a true circle (or cylinder).

Standard shapes

Some standard shapes can be generated using a command. This includes a cylinder, cone and cuboid. In older versions (3D 2013, and before) the commands for a cylinder and a cone still supported segments along the curved shape, but since 3D AE these shapes internally use a mathematical description.


Figure 6. From left to right: a cylinder, cone and cube

Command examples

cylinder
Signature: cylinder radius height (xO yO zO) (xV yV zV)
To create circular volume pile with its top center point at (5 5 0), a length of 8 m vertically downward (vector direction will be (0 0 -1)) and a diameter of 0.80 m (radius = 0.4 m) we can use this command:

cylinder0.48(220)(00-1)

cone
Signature: cone base_radius height (xO yO zO)
To create a cone with a base radius of 1.2 m, a height of 4 m with its base centre point at (6 2 -5) we can use this command, pointing up (0 0 1):

cone1.24(62-5)(001)

cuboid
Signature: cuboid sidelength (xO yO zO)
To create a cube with sides of 2.5 m, with the bottom side's centre located at the (10 0 -6), use this command:

cuboid2.5(100-6)

Pile geometry
The cone command can now also be used to create a tapered pile directly:


Figure 7. Tapered pile

See also the Command and objects reference and the compatibility notes for commands for more details.

Reading older PLAXIS 3D files

When reading older PLAXIS 3D files that contain (triangle based) tessellated geometry,  PLAXIS 3D 2016 will attempt to convert this tessellated geometry to the parametric geometric data structure.

  • Boreholes: Soil layers defined via boreholes used to be stored as tessellated geometry in PLAXIS 3D AE, 3D 2013 and older. When loading a model in PLAXIS 3D 2016 (and newer), these boreholes and their resulting soil layer definition will be regenerated using parametric geometry.
  • Surface and volumes: Surfaces and volumes created in PLAXIS 3D AE are already defined as parametric geometry, and so these can directly be loaded in PLAXIS 3D 2016. However, geometry created in older versions (3D 2013 and older) as well as geometry imported from CAD files are based on triangulated, tessellated definition, and cannot be directly loaded into PLAXIS 3D 2016. PLAXIS will attempt to load these triangulated shapes by converting all internal triangles into parametric definitions. When the geometry has a limited amount of triangles, this can be achieved. However, if the geometry consists of many triangles, this will not be possible, and these surfaces and volumes will not be loaded in PLAXIS 3D. Hence, these geometric objects are removed from the Plaxis model.

Whenever PLAXIS 3D detects it needs to change the geometry to make the transition from triangulated/tessellated geometry to fully parametric geometry, the new geometry will require a new intersection. Following from this, a new mesh will need to be generated and the project will need to be completely recalculated.
Hint: if you have selected points for curves, then make sure to reselect them again before the calculation via the Select points for curves option in Output or directly via the command line in Input.
The program will directly store the file under a new name to prevent accidentally overwriting the original file. The new PLAXIS 3D file will be stored in the same folder and "_converted" will be added to the filename.

In some cases, the required changes are too great, or critical triangulated shapes are removed from the model. In that case, it is recommended to use a hybrid version of PLAXIS 3D that supports both triangulated and parametric geometry. This hybrid version will be available as PLAXIS 3D Classic (similar to 3D AE but with some updates). PLAXIS 3D Classic will be located in a subfolder of the PLAXIS 3D installation folder called "classic". To start Input for PLAXIS 3D Classic, start Plaxis3DInput.exe from this subfolder "classic".

Import of CAD geometry files

Since PLAXIS 3D 2016 only allows parametric geometry, and does not accept triangulated geometry, the program can no longer import CAD files based on triangulated geometry. This means PLAXIS 3D will no longer support the import of *.3DS, *.DWG, and triangulated *.DXF.

For more details on the support import types, please see the page on How do I import a geometry in PLAXIS 3D?

If you still need to import these CAD files using triangulated geometries, PLAXIS 3D Classic is still available for this.

Conclusion

With the fully parametric geometry data in PLAXIS 3D 2016, we solved problems with intersection, mesh quality for curved shapes and interface locking. PLAXIS 3D 2016 will provide you with:

  • Fewer problems during intersection;
  • Fewer performance issues;
  • Fewer issues in mesh generation;
  • Improved mesh quality with fewer elements required;
  • Faster calculations due to fewer elements when having curved shapes;
  • More accurate results when using curved shapes, especially when loaded in shear.

This major change to PLAXIS 3D will make the program faster, more reliable, more accurate, and better equipped for geotechnical challenges, especially when dealing with large and complex geometries.

[Solved] Incorrect external water pressures could be applied inside a tunnel (PLAXIS 3D AE)

$
0
0
Solved since:
Known Issue ID:
24015

Problem description

In some cases when using a PLAXIS 3D AE model with tunnels, it can happen that the external water pressures (water loads from a water body acting on a free surface) are not applied correctly on the tunnel circumference. This is important for when for instance modelling a grout pressure by using a user defined pore pressure.
This, of course, will not give the expected results of an analysis.

You can see this happening when inspecting a phase’s preview or its result, for which part of the geometry does not have external water loads applied at all.

 

Figure 1. Example of missing external water loads

Solution

This issue is now resolved in PLAXIS 3D 2016.00.

For older versions, when the above happens in your model, it can be solved by splitting the existing polycurve of the tunnel into two parts. The following can be done, for example:

  1. go to Structures mode and select to edit the specific tunnel
  2. add a horizontal subsection line
  3. intersect the horizontal line with the existing tunnel
  4. delete the just created horizontal line (not needed in the geometry, we only need to create two sections here)
  5. do not forget to Regenerate the tunnel!

Figure 2. Horizontal subsection line to intersect the existing tunnel

 

 

Connections made in 3D AE give access violation error in 3D 2016.00

$
0
0
Application:
Known Issue ID:
10767

Problem description

Projects created with PLAXIS 3D AE or PLAXIS 3D Classic that contain custom connections will encounter problems during the regeneration of the staged construction settings in the PLAXIS 3D 2016 version.
This problem occurs both with custom connections between two plates and between a plate and a beam.

As a result, an access violation bugreport appears when trying to switch to any of the green modes (Mesh, Flow conditions, Staged construction).

Solution

In order to be able to continue working in the existing project with PLAXIS 3D 2016.00 version follow the steps below:

  1. Open project in 3D Classic Input program
  2. Delete any custom connections in staged construction mode
  3. Save the project with a different name (e.g. myproject_no_connections.p3d)
  4. Open project in 3D 2016.00 version
  5. Re-create the custom connection(s) manually

Alternatively, you can use PLAXIS 3D Classic for your project.

Plaxis is working on a solution for this issue.

Viewing all 329 articles
Browse latest View live